Pluggable vs. co-packaged optics in AI data centers: Power, scale and design trade-offs
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- Pluggable and co-packaged optics (CPO) will coexist in AI data centers.
- CPO offers compelling power and signal integrity benefits.
- Operational realities keep pluggable optics central to cloud and enterprise networks.
High-speed networking and AI infrastructure are moving into a world where pluggable optics and co-packaged optics (CPO) coexist rather than displace one another. Over the next five to 10 years, pluggable modules are expected to remain the default choice for most links, while CPO becomes an important option wherever power, density and electrical-reach requirements at 800G–1.6T strain traditional front-panel designs.
Key concepts: Pluggable optics vs. co-packaged optics
When comparing pluggables and CPO, it’s useful to treat them as complementary rather than as potential winners and losers. Why?
- Pluggable optics are still projected to dominate deployed port counts because they are flexible, mature and straightforward to operate.
- CPO becomes attractive where bandwidth and port density are pushed so far that long high-speed electrical traces and front-panel cages become the limiting factors.
- The strongest technical and economic case for CPO appears in artificial intelligence/machine learninig (AI/ML) clusters, very high-radix core fabrics and advanced mobile transport, where aggregate bandwidth and rack-level power are already under significant pressure.
IEEE and other technical forums increasingly frame the discussion this way: rather than asking which technology wins, architects decide where each makes the most sense in each network design and operational model.
Pluggable optics in data center and cloud network design
In a pluggable-based design, the switch ASIC sits on the main PCB and connects over high-speed electrical traces to cages on the front panel, which accept optical modules such as QSFP-DD, OSFP or their 800G variants. This structure brings several advantages in day-to-day operation.
First, pluggables provide significant operational flexibility. Port by port, operators can select speed, reach and modulation. An example is combining 400ZR, 800G short-reach and longer-reach modules in the same chassis where supported. As traffic patterns or architectures evolve, ports can be re-equipped without replacing the entire switch, which is valuable when managing fleets with staggered lifecycles and constantly changing service requirements.
Second, pluggables benefit from a well-established ecosystem. Years of interoperability work, multi-source agreements and standardization (including 400ZR/800ZR and OpenZR+) underpin these modules. Analyst coverage characterizes the pluggable market as stable and scalable: compatible modules are available from multiple vendors, cost trends are predictable and manufacturing experience is deep at speeds up to at least 800G per port.
However, scaling toward 800G and beyond exposes real limits. Long high-speed traces between ASIC and front panel become increasingly lossy, forcing more aggressive equalization and sometimes more aggressive equalization and retimer/digital signal processor (DSP) overhead, increasing overall system power. At the same time, front panels packed with dense, high-power modules push rack-level thermal budgets to the limit, making cooling and airflow design substantially more challenging.
In short, pluggables remain highly effective, but as systems move to 51.2T-class switches and consider 1.6T ports, physical and thermal constraints become difficult to work around with front-panel pluggable architectures alone.
Co-packaged optics architecture for AI and high-radix switches
Co-packaged optics address these constraints by placing optical engines in the same package as the switch or accelerator ASIC, so only fiber exits the package and the electrical path from logic to light shrinks from tens of centimeters to a few millimeters. This approach greatly improves signal integrity by avoiding the losses and reflections associated with long PCB routes at 112G or 224G per lane.
This shift promises some notable benefits.
- Higher-speed serializer/deserializer (SerDes), for example, 200G per lane, can operate with less equalization overhead and fewer DSP stages, improving power efficiency per bit.
- More optical I/O can be placed around a single ASIC, expanding total switch throughput and port count without a proportional increase in front-panel density.
- System designs can move toward a compact electrical domain, with most long-reach connectivity handled in fiber, which scales more naturally as bandwidth grows.
Vendor roadmaps and technical presentations often cite potential power reductions approaching one-third of the operating power of pluggables and perhaps 40% lower cost per bit once third-generation CPO platforms based on 200G-per-lane optics line up with 51.2T and 100T-class switch generations. For AI fabrics and large GPU clusters, where power and cooling budgets are tight and east–west traffic is growing dramatically, such gains become highly attractive.
These benefits, however, come with operational and mechanical trade-offs. Integrating optics into the same package as the ASIC currently limits the ease of swapping transceivers in the field compared to pluggables. If an optical engine in a CPO package fails, repair may involve replacing the entire CPO assembly or an entire line card, altering spares inventory strategies and maintenance procedures.
Configurability is also reduced: co-packaged units typically use uniform optics, so mixing different reaches or speeds on a per-port basis is not as straightforward as in pluggable-based systems. Access for cleaning and inspection of fiber interfaces can be more constrained, increasing reliance on robust management and diagnostics to monitor the health of tightly integrated optical engines.
Market forecasts for co-packaged optics vs. pluggable modules
Market and analyst reports paint a consistent picture of CPO as a rapidly growing but still relatively small segment during this decade. Forecasts commonly project CPO revenues reaching the low single-digit billions of dollars by the late 2020s, with compound annual growth rates in the 30–40% range, while pluggable modules retain the majority of deployed data center optical links throughout this period.
The earliest broad CPO deployments are expected in AI/ML super-clusters, very high-radix spine and core switches, and selected 5G/6G transport roles where extreme bandwidth density and tight power constraints leave few alternatives. In contrast, general cloud and enterprise top-of-rack, aggregation, and many metro applications are expected to remain heavily pluggable-centric because serviceability, multivendor sourcing and operational simplicity are valued more highly than the last increments of power savings per port.
On the standards front, several efforts are directly shaping both advanced pluggables and CPO. Work within organizations such as the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) on 112G/224G Common Electrical I/O (CEI), co-packaging frameworks and linear pluggable optics is especially significant. These activities influence how future switch ASICs, pluggable modules and CPO engines interoperate electrically and how they are managed via consistent interfaces such as CMIS extensions. Rather than treating CPO as a siloed technology, the standards community is creating a continuum that enables system designers to choose among advanced pluggables, linear pluggables and co-packaged options based on specific system requirements.
Design strategy: When to use pluggables vs. co-packaged optics
For architects and operators, a practical approach is to view pluggables and CPO as distinct tools for different layers and constraints within a single architecture. Over the next five to 10 years, expert technical and analyst sources consistently point toward a hybrid future: continued investment in pluggable optics for most links with selective adoption of CPO where bandwidth density and energy efficiency are paramount.
In practical terms, a likely pattern looks like this:
- Pluggable optics remain the mainstay for top-of-rack, many spine roles, and DCI links, where hot-swap capability, broad vendor choice and a deeply mature ecosystem offer clear operational benefits.
- CPO sees targeted deployment in AI fabrics, large GPU pods and core switches once port speeds and radix approach the limits of what can be cooled and signaled reliably through traditional front-panel pluggable configurations.
- Linear pluggable optics and higher-speed electrical standards extend the life and usefulness of pluggables in some tiers, allowing architectures that combine both approaches: advanced pluggables at the edge of the fabric and CPO in the most demanding aggregation or core layers.
The most practical question is not “pluggables or CPO?” but “which technology is a better fit for the specific constraints of power, density, flexibility, serviceability and lifecycle for each part of the network?” With that framing, pluggables continue to serve as flexible, field-replaceable, multivendor optics for a broad range of applications, while CPO is introduced selectively in segments where extreme bandwidth and tight energy budgets justify the complexity and integration effort of combining optics and switching silicon in a single package.
Related Links:
- How N&C engineers can manage 7 top AI challenges
- Whitepaper: Why network speed defines AI performance
Avnet Networking and Communications Solutions
